Astrophysicist Shows How One Small Change to Our Solar System Could Unravel It
As we discover more solar systems
in the Milky Way, it becomes more and more obvious how drastically different
our Solar System might have been.
In actuality, none of the nearly
4,000 planetary systems discovered to date correspond to the arrangement and
sequence of planets orbiting our own Sun. That might be the case because we are
presently unable to detect analogues of the Solar System. But from what we can
detect out there, planetary systems seem to span an extraordinary variety of
arrangements.
Now, astronomer Stephen Kane of
the University of California, Riverside has demonstrated that the Solar System
as a whole would malfunction if we made just one alteration.
Adding a second planet of a type a
common in other systems is a comparatively minor modification.
That fictitious planet would have
to be a super-Earth or mini-Neptune, with a mass of 17 Earth masses, falling
between Earth and Neptune.
We don't have a super-Earth or
mini-Neptune in the Solar System, despite how frequent they are elsewhere in
the galaxy, which leaves a mass gap between the rocky terrestrial planets and
the gaseous ones.
What we do have in the Solar
System, however, is a gaping physical separation between the rocky and gaseous
planets, delineated by an asteroid belt, between the orbits of Mars and
Jupiter.
Kane says, "Planetary
scientists frequently wish there was something in between those two planets. It
appears to be unused space.
Kane ran simulations in which he
placed a planet with a mass range between Mars and Jupiter in that space and
observed the ensuing chaos to see what would happen to the Solar System if he
filled both gaps at once.
And there was definitely
pandemonium.
Kane claims that "this
made-up planet" nudges Jupiter just enough to upset the balance of
everything else. "It's a fortunate thing we don't have this extra planet,
even though many astronomers have wished for it,"
The current planets may be
completely ejected from the Solar System as a consequence of the chaos,
depending on the mass and location of this simulated world in the region
between Mars and Jupiter. Jupiter is 5.2 astronomical units from the Sun, while
Mars is on average 1.5 astronomical units away. A planet can live quite
peacefully if it is positioned at 3 astronomical units, but pretty much
anywhere else leads to a complete planetary omnishambles.
Mercury is a planet that resides
between 3.1 and 4 astronomical units from the Sun. Mars begins to tremble at
2.0 to 2.7 astronomical units. Although Jupiter and Saturn only undergo slight
alterations, the angular momentum they transfer to Uranus and Neptune in the
outer Solar System makes the icy giants unstable as well.
At worst, Venus, Mercury, Earth,
Mars, Uranus, and Neptune all get expelled from the Solar System. Smaller
modifications cause Earth's orbit to diverge dramatically from its present
path, making our planet less habitable, if not entirely inhospitable.
Jupiter may contribute to Earth's
habitability by shielding us from asteroids, according to existing evidence.
Kane's research indicates that it also contributes to the stability of the
Solar System by preventing the formation of a planet in the region where the
asteroid belt is located.
The total mass of the asteroid
belt is believed to be just 0.04 percent of Earth's mass, not nearly enough
material for a planet to form at this time. The asteroid belt, however, is
believed to have been significantly heavier earlier in the Solar System's
history
For some time, astronomers have hypothesized
that planetary systems with a Jupiter counterpart are the most likely to be
stable enough for life. Kane's models give the case more support.
They also imply that the
architecture of the Solar System may be a delicate balance that is challenging
to sustain.
More precisely calibrated than I
previously realized, Kane claims that our solar system. "Everything
functions like complex clock mechanisms. Add more cogs, and everything falls
apart."
Comments
Post a Comment